4.1 Introduction
In the era of digital transformation, managing large volumes of data enhances public sector efficiency, creates new policy opportunities, and redefines service standards and accessibility. This shift affects every aspect of public administration, including the justice sector. The primary challenge is to implement these changes incrementally while modernising existing processes and integrating them into new workflows to drive innovation.
Investing in digitalisation of justice contributes to enhancing the effectiveness, quality and accessibility of justice systems, which is an important area for action for Member States and the EU.
- Between 2019 and 2023, the e-Justice strategy aimed to improve and simplify access to information and to support specifically the digitalisation of cross-border judicial and extra-judicial proceedings. Its aim was also to enhance effectiveness, cooperation among legal authorities, and citizens’ access to justice. Emphasis was placed on legislative action that supports a secure and interoperable EU cross-border IT system for judicial information exchange and collaboration.
- In a 2020 Communication, the Commission called on Member States to continue to invest in digitalisation of justice to facilitate cross-border cooperation and emphasised that access to justice is one of the main objectives of the EU’s area of freedom, security, and justice. Making the digital channel an available option in EU judicial cooperation (e-CODEX) contributes to more efficient cross-border proceedings and the development of more and better tools for citizens and businesses to access justice.
- The next milestones are set out in the e-Justice strategy for 2024-2028. The e-Justice Portal is the key entry point to information online about EU and Member States’ justice systems and cross-border judicial cooperation.
The e-Justice Portal ![]() The e-Justice Portal is an online one-stop shop in the area of justice. It provides information on more than 150 topics such as the legal systems of the EU Member States, case law in the EU, protection of fundamental rights, and consumer protection. It is available in all EU official languages. The Portal provides more than 30 000 pages of content covering various legal areas, containing the following
The Portal also provides user-friendly forms and assists the user in finding answers to many legal questions. The e-Justice Portal can be accessed here: https://e-justice.europa.eu/. |
Similarly, at the national level, an essential initial step is developing a strategic plan that commits to digital transformation, outlines funding and continuous change, assigns responsibilities and sets specific targets and timelines.
Each justice system will determine which digital tools and solutions to employ and how digitalisation can enhance their effectiveness. Ensuring some level of uniformity across Member States will ultimately support improved judicial cooperation and provide guidance for citizens throughout the EU (considering the mobility of citizens and businesses within the single market). However, the examples provided are primarily of national interest to contribute to more effective justice systems, focusing on digital tools to improve access to justice and managing the justice system more effectively through information exchange and case management, use of artificial intelligence to support judges and court staff, and organising electronic evidence.
4.2 Strategic planning to digitalise justice
The digital transition is a reality for all aspects of public life, including justice. In the context of the Digital Decade, the European Commission is encouraging Member States ‘to use opportunities supporting their digital transformation, such as the Technical Support Instrument (TSI) and other EU funding mechanisms, as well as targeted training and tools. They can actively participate in the Commission’s efforts to facilitate the electronic exchange of data between public administrations across borders and to improve their interoperability. They can also use the Commission’s support to digitalise their justice systems through legislation, funding, development of IT tools and promotion of national coordination and monitoring instruments.’ European Commission Communication: Enhancing the European Administrative Space (ComPAct).
This inevitable process of digitalisation requires strategic planning, assessing what digital tools best suit their justice system and improve its effectiveness, and continuous maintenance. It also demands a cultural shift in justice administration towards digital-first policies and a ‘digital by design’ approach to system organisation.
The Council of Europe’s European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) Working Group on Cyberjustice and Artificial Intelligence published a Toolkit for the implementation of Guidelines on Cyberjustice in 2019 that can be useful to consult to strategically plan and inform about how to drive change in the justice system. It also includes an outline on how to build an effective case management system and a list of points that should be kept in mind when developing large IT projects.
A notable example of the first steps towards change is the Digital Justice project in Spain, which tries to leverage advanced technologies to transform the public service of justice.
![]() Spain's digitalisation ranking, 7th out of the 27 EU members, is a testament to its leading role at the European level. This success is further underscored by its climb to the 5th position in public services, a clear indication of its pioneering lead in developing new digital services. From health to digital identification, cybersecurity to mobile applications, and the integration of artificial intelligence in the public sector, Spain is making significant strides in all of these domains (Economy and Society Index 2022). Within this context, the Ministry of the Presidency, Justice and Parliamentary Relations of Spain is at the forefront of using the most advanced technological solutions to achieve a more modern, efficient, and agile justice system. These efforts are part of the comprehensive ‘2030 Justice Plan’. This 10-year plan endorses the Rule of Law and Access to Justice as transformation levers of justice services. The regions, other ministries, and non-judiciary institutions support it. Objective 2 of the plan, Improving the efficiency of the public justice service, unfolds different programmes and projects to ensure digital justice. In the words of Aitor Cubo, Director General of Digital Transformation, ‘the strategic objective for the Ministry of the Presidency, Justice and Parliamentary Relations is to position Justice as a public service that all citizens can recognise as they do with health or security’.[1] The digital transformation is not a solitary effort but a collaborative one supported by the Autonomous Communities. This is evident in its institutionalised co-governance approach, implemented through the Technical Committee for Electronic Judicial Administration (CTEAJE). The Committee's presidency is not held by a single entity. It is shared and rotates every 2 years between the Ministry of the Presidency, Justice and Parliamentary Relations and the General Council of the Judiciary, showcasing the shared responsibilities and commitment to the strategic endeavour. The 2022 Royal Decree-Law 6/2023, of December 19, approving urgent measures for the implementation of the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan in the areas of public justice service, civil service, local government and patronage defines a new legal framework for the digital transformation of the justice administration.[2] It regulates the accessibility and legal certainty of digital services. The law also governs citizens’ rights to personalised access to justice procedures, information, and services. Finally, the Law reinforces legal security in online proceedings and services, enabling secure telematic trials and hearings. The project's financial resources were boosted thanks to the European funds: the 2030 Justice Plan benefited from €410 million allocated for justice projects and initiatives in the Recovery and Resilience Plan, a clear testimony that digital justice is one of the pillars of the digitalisation of Spain’s Public Administration.[3] Digital justice projects and initiatives Digital justice is becoming a reality. The level of robotic process automation and the use of artificial intelligence in many of the internal and external services provided are making a difference. The 2030 Justice Plan comprises 13 areas of improvement with around 200 projects, many of which are internal to the organisation. The projects with direct external impact have the double aim of improving the services offered to justice professionals and reducing existing gaps affecting the population due to age, territoriality, different disabilities and gender, according to Aitor Cubo.
After summarising these iconic projects, it is important to notice that lawsuits decided in court entail winners and losers. This unique feature does not happen in the delivery of other services. Therefore, the ministry is approaching service satisfaction differently than in other areas. According to Mr. Aitor Cubo, ‘measuring the success of the justice services through users’ surveys might end up with biased results, so we are promoting a different approach. For example, we are conducting focus groups to understand citizens’ perspectives. We did that with the Justice Folder (Carpeta Justicia) project and got excellent interaction and results’.[10] In conclusion, the justice service provision in Spain is modernising through digitalisation, artificial intelligence, robotisation, and automation of many processes. There are some challenges ahead, such as the need for qualified technical personnel, the limited budget once European funds are finished. It is important to identify that ‘digitalisation has an enormous effect on exposing inefficient bureaucratic structures’.[11] This power of digitalisation is highly relevant in a world where judges and court staff enjoy high independence in how courts are run. Awards
Source: Office of the General Director of Digital Transformation, Ministry of the Presidency, Justice and Parliamentary Relations, Spain. |
In Malta, the Digital Justice Strategy represents also significant advancement in the country’s justice system, transitioning from a paper-based system to a digital one.
![]() In 2019, Malta started to modernise its legal services with the support of the European Commission. The main aim was to establish a Digital Justice Strategy for the Maltese Justice sector in line with European good practices. Previous attempts to digitalise the justice sector in Malta, had proven to be inconsistent and lacking an evidence-informed strategy. To achieve effective digitalisation of the justice system, it was imperative to involve relevant stakeholders. Consequently, Malta sought assistance from the European Commission to support its digital reform through the development of a Digital Justice Strategy. As a result, the Maltese government adopted its own Digital Justice Strategy, which was launched in December 2021, following initial stakeholder consultations regarding the Action Plan designed to facilitate the implementation of the Strategy. The Strategy’s main goals are to fully digitalise the justice system, enhance public access to the justice system and to improve the analytical capabilities and digital skills of the staff within the justice sector. In order to achieve these goals, the security of the digital tools will be aligned with those set at EU level and the Strategy will undergo continuous audits to ensure alignment with the latest technology and innovation, including ongoing training programmes. User trust in the digital environment is essential; without it, the entire digital justice system could be compromised. The Strategy has embraced a ‘Digital by Design and Digital by Default’ methodology, signifying a complete transition from the previous paper-based system to one that is predominantly digital. It is expected that the Digital Justice Strategy, with an investment of around €300 000 co-financed by European funds, will improve the efficiency and quality of the Maltese justice system. In April 2022 the project was selected as the ‘Project in the Spotlight’ by the Directorate-General for Structural Reform Support (DG REFORM). More information can be found here: Digital Justice. To download the Strategy, please click here. |
Member States face diverse challenges in digitalising their judicial systems. The EU Justice Scoreboard has shown this disparity since 2013. For instance, electronic file access is available in 10 Member States for civil law procedures, and in 7 and 9 Member States for victims and defendants in criminal cases, respectively. Digital evidence submission is possible in 13 Member States for criminal proceedings and in 10 for civil and commercial law. The slow digitalisation of registers and databases, complicates access for individuals, businesses, and legal practitioners, with paper files still prevalent.[13]
Budgets dedicated to digitalisation vary across Member States. As an example, in terms of the average participation of implemented courts’ budget for ICT in the total budget of courts for EU countries from 2016 to 2020.
- In Italy, the share of the ICT budget was around 1.7 %.
- Denmark had a higher proportion, with the ICT budget share being approximately 5.2 %.
- Poland’s ICT budget share was slightly lower than Denmark’s, at around 4.4 %.
- Lithuania had an ICT budget share of about 3.3 %.
- Bulgaria had the smallest share, with the ICT budget making up approximately 0.5% of the total budget of courts.[14]
In terms of average implemented budget of courts per capita and the average implemented budget dedicated to ICT per capita for several countries, funding also varies.
- In Italy, the average implemented court budget per capita is around €30, while the average implemented ICT budget per capita is about €1.
- Denmark has an average implemented court budget per capita of approximately €60 and an average implemented ICT budget per capita of around 43.
- Both Poland and Lithuania have an average implemented court budget per capita of about €10, with an average implemented ICT budget per capita of approximately €0.5.
- In Estonia, the average implemented court budget per capita is around €20, and the average implemented ICT budget per capita is about €1.
- The Netherlands has an average implemented court budget per capita of approximately €50 and an average implemented ICT budget per capita of around €4.
- Bulgaria has the smallest average implemented court budget per capita and ICT budget per capita, at approximately €5 and €0.25 respectively.[15]
Implementing innovative technologies in the justice field presents several challenges: manually processing large amounts of structured and unstructured data and documents, analysing large volumes of video, audio, and image files, and extracting information from multiple, often non-centralised sources. There are also difficulties in making judicial information or services user-friendly and easily accessible, ensuring compliance with personal data protection laws for court documents, and handling large datasets with simple tools.
There are initiatives at both EU and national level. The Council e-Justice strategy (2024 - 2028) guides Member States in implementing a broad range of legislative and non-legislative initiatives to accelerate digitalisation and AI in justice. The strategy outlines principles and objectives for improving e-Justice in the EU over 5 years, explains the steps needed to reach these objectives and how progress will be tracked and managed in the future. It also aims to inspire everyone involved in the digital transformation of justice across the EU.
The EU actively supports the digital transformation of the justice sector in its Member States through several funding programmes.
- The Digital Europe Programme, with a total budget of €7.6 billion, aims to bolster Europe's digital capabilities and enhance the widespread deployment of digital technologies.
- The Justice Programme, endowed with around €305 million for the period up to 2027, focuses on facilitating access to justice for individuals and businesses, promoting judicial cooperation, and supporting the training of legal practitioners.
- The Technical Support Instrument (TSI) also plays a crucial role in contributing to the digitalisation of justice by providing tailored support to Member States in implementing reforms.
- Significantly, the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) has allocated substantial funds to support the digitalisation of justice systems.
All funding opportunities contribute to support Member States in developing crucial advanced digital tools and systems, ensuring that the justice sector becomes more efficient, accessible, and resilient across the EU.
One notable aspect of national digitalisation initiatives is the risk of justice privatisation. In Belgium for instance, the responsibility for implementing digital tools is shifting from the judiciary to the Belgian bar.[16] A study on dispute resolution for consumers also found that the use of ICT can privatise the enforcement of legal decisions and affect the underlying methods used to justify dispute resolution.[17] Other research links alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and increased opportunities for self-representation, often supported by technology.[18]
4.3 Digital tools improving access to justice
Digitalisation has transformed the ability of judicial administrations to open up access to justice to all parties, especially members of the public, as illustrated by Austria’s JustizOnline: a digital platform for public service, also contributing to environmental sustainability through digital file handling and electronic inspection.
![]() ‘JustizOnline (in German) is the digital public service platform of the independent Austrian courts and public prosecution offices, which provides digital access to judicial proceedings. Its goal is to enhance trust in the judiciary, eliminate existing barriers and ensure easy access to justice for the public. Each citizen can interact with the judiciary in a simple, digital way and submit personal judicial matters quickly and unbureaucratically. The services offered include selected online court procedures, 24 hours a day from any desktop or smartphone. The project extends the independent courts and public prosecution office services to include cutting-edge, charge-free, and transparent digital services. The highest security and accessibility standards are guaranteed. The project JustizOnline, launched in 2018 following a ministerial proposal to digitalise the judiciary, had several objectives
A broad range of citizens were involved on site at the court to test the developed prototypes. Within the implementation project, several internal user-friendly reviews were conducted on a use case-oriented workshop basis with judges and secretaries. A homogenous and modern appearance of the judiciary is ensured by integrating previously isolated services. This is an essential factor in the public perception of the judiciary as a modern, easily accessible, citizen-oriented and professional public institution. With the creation of this platform, the Austrian judiciary provides state-of-the-art and citizen-friendly access to the judicial services, and become more transparent and comprehensible to citizens and businesses. In this way, it is increasing confidence in the judiciary as the third pillar of the rule of law and contributing to build a better Europe, enhancing legal certainty and peace. JustizOnline is in continuous expansion with planification of several further services; therefore, the team is still working to enhance the platform and implement new features to address various target groups. At the core of the project, the task of the judiciary – the creation of legal certainty and peace – remains unchanged, and it is considered essential how these services arrive at the citizen. This is exactly where this new service comes into play and creates considerable benefits for all citizens and companies in Austria, through the fundamental redesign of the accompanying value-added processes. JustizOnline also facilitates an optimisation of processes at court; the digital shift will enhance efficiency in the administration and will lead to reduced waiting and travel time as well as costs. Emissions are reduced due to cutting the need to travel and eliminating the need for printing thousands of pages due to digital file handling and electronic inspection. This project is therefore also making a contribution to protect the environment, which underlines the sustainability of this project from operational, financial, and environmental points of view.’ The project was awarded the second prize in the category Digital in the European Public Sector Award 2021. Source: European Public Sector Award |
Digital access to justice has many dimensions. The following issues relate to publication of laws and judgments, the use of metadata to access EU case law, applying digital tools to achieve people-centred justice, the role of chatbots, and online court hearings.
Publication of legislation and judgments
Member States have made efforts to make legislation available on online platforms for easier access. They publish the official gazette in an interactive and searchable manner and update it daily with new laws and amendments. The Casemates project in Luxembourg provides an interesting example of this process. A key element is to ensure that online platforms function as open data to integrate information into new tools. Accessibility should be maintained for all users, including those with disabilities, by ensuring screen reader compatibility and adjustable text sizes.
![]() Luxembourg’s legislation used to be primarily paper-based, making access difficult for people, businesses and civil servants, and sometimes also for ministries. However, this has been overtaken by a new paradigm: access, sharing and enriching legislative information. In this context, a change in the direction of digitalisation was necessary. The ‘Casemates’ project by the Ministry of State’s Central Legislation Service is part of an initiative to open and reuse data. This approach aligns with the concept of linked data or semantic web technologies, organising resources to enhance machine readability and providing them under an open license for reuse by businesses, associations, or any interested parties. In January 2017, a comprehensive set of new applications and websites was launched. This ecosystem facilitates the sharing and interconnection of legal information across different applications, improving access to legislation for citizens and businesses. The major objectives behind this initiative were
A new portal for Luxembourg legislation, legilux.lu (in French) was established. This portal not only improved access to and the exchange of information, but also reduced legislative complexity. With the digitalisation of the publication process and standardisation of texts in legislative procedures, administrative costs were lowered. Additionally, better search results were provided on the portal and via search engines like Google, enabling users to easily access current legislation. The project is considered successful. The quality, adaptability, and reusability of the solution, thanks to semantic web technologies, led to its adoption by other countries. For example, the Swiss federal government implemented the Casemates software, treaty management application, text publication application and legislative process monitoring application. These applications were customised, and the data migration was completed in just 18 months, becoming operational for the Swiss federal government since 1 January 2021. In February 2021, the Italian government also decided to adopt the legislative data model of Luxembourg (jolux ontology) and Casemates applications to develop their new official journal. The Casemate project not only reduces project costs and risk, but also enhances semantic interoperability between legislations of the European countries for the benefit of European citizens, professionals and companies. Source: European Public Sector Award |
Also at the European level continuous efforts are undertaken to make EU law more accessible by providing information online and connecting the information from national level.
Online information on EU and Member State legislation ![]() The EU contributes several online tools aiming to provide information about EU and national laws within one online platform. EUR-Lex EUR-Lex is the online gateway to EU law. It provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU legal documents, available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages and updated daily. This platform is essential for accessing treaties, legislative acts, preparatory documents, case law, and international agreements. n-LEX n-LEX is an online service that provides access to the national legislation of the EU Member States. This portal serves as a single point of access to the national law databases of individual EU countries, making it easier for users to find and understand national legislation. It connects seamlessly with EUR-Lex, ensuring that users can move between EU-level and national-level legal information. European Legislation Identifier (ELI) The ELI is a system designed to make legislation available online in a standardised format, so that it can be accessed, exchanged, and reused across borders. ELI uses HTTP URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers), which can be read by both humans and computers, and proposes a set of metadata elements to describe legislation, including a specific language for exchanging legislation in a machine-readable format. ELIs have been implemented in various national legislation publishing systems, and are used to link national legislation databases to EUR-Lex, providing a comprehensive and interconnected legal landscape. At the EU level, ELIs are assigned to a wide range of legislation published in the L series (regulations, directives, decisions) of the Official Journal of the European Union and to consolidated acts. From your personal account or ‘Customise shown information’, you can set your preferences so that the ELI appears in the results. It is always displayed on the document page. Overall, these tools - EUR-Lex, n-LEX, and ELI - work together to create a seamless and integrated system for accessing and understanding both EU and national legal documents, thereby supporting legal transparency and accessibility across the European Union. ELIs have also been deployed in a number of national legislation publishing systems. They are implemented on a voluntary basis. The ELI implementation status can be reviewed at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli-register/implementation.html. |
Many countries have digital platforms for jurisprudence publication, enhancing access to case law. The Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers recommended in 1995 that legal information systems should be easily accessible and updated regularly.[19] The Consultative Council of European Judges advocates also for free, accessible online case law, respecting data protection.[20]
Online access rates to published judgments by the general public show that in all EU Member States, except Portugal and Sweden, all judgments are available for civil/commercial and administrative cases, respectively. All first instance criminal courts judgments are available in EU Member States, except in Greece, Slovenia, and Finland. For high instance courts, second instance criminal courts, and highest instance courts, all judgments are accessible online to the general public in all EU Member States.[21]
The #Access to Information and Court Rulings# project in Poland allows for readily available statistical data and court rulings online.
![]() Even before its Strategy for Modernising Justice Area in Poland 2014-2020 was approved, the Ministry of Justice had set up a new website in 2013: Justice System Statistical Information: Statistics Poland / Databases (in Polish). This platform includes statistical databases, best practices, national and international data comparisons, and relevant terms and definitions. It is accessible to a wide audience, including justice professionals, NGOs, academics, and the general public, ensuring transparent data on the Polish justice system and supporting efficient, competent and effective justice. This accessibility enables social control and feedback and the platform itself facilitates informed decision-making by making relevant information readily available. The Ministry of Justice is committed to continuously updating and expanding the information available on the portal. At the same time, three other IT tools are being continuously developed, to improve quality and increase accessibility of public service delivered by the justice system.
Source: Ministry of Justice, Poland |
Access to case law and ECLI (European Case Law Identifier)
In accordance with principles of proportionality and decentralisation, there should be no centralised European database for national case law. Different databases with varying functionalities should meet specific user needs.[22] To ensure interoperability, the EU has developed the European Case Law Identifier (ECLI). The European Commission provides a central ECLI search interface for the public in collaboration with participating case law providers.
The ECLI standard provides a common identifier and metadata set, understandable by both humans and computers. It allows national systems to coexist with or adopt this European standard, which can also be the exclusive national standard if desired. ECLI includes five elements: ‘ECLI’ label, country code, court code, judgment year, and a 25-character max number.
Many EU Member States already use the ECLI standard to publishing national judgments. This can also be done using funding support of the European Commission, such as the Technical Support Instrument that is implemented by Directorate-General for Structural Reform Support (DG REFORM). More information about the ECLI and the status of implementation can be found on the e-Justice Portal.
Digital tools and people-centred justice
Technology can reduce barriers to justice services. Increased use of a multichannel approach to access justice seems to be the future to ensure access for all people to justice. This includes communication channels via mobile phones and specific mobile phone-supported applications, as well as ‘live chat’ features which can provide for better scale effects and can lower costs for justice systems, thereby making justice accessible to financially disadvantaged groups.[23]
For Member States, identifying early signals of crime significantly improves the efficiency of the justice system. Early detection of potential misconduct, wrongdoing, or crime facilitates immediate action, preventing further harm or damage. It also inhibits the escalation of criminal activities, ensuring that detected crimes do not become more severe or widespread. These early signals provide valuable evidence for legal proceedings, with the information provided by whistleblowers being instrumental in building strong cases against perpetrators. The mere knowledge that crimes can be detected early can function as a deterrent for potential criminals, potentially leading to a reduction in crime rates. Furthermore, insights gained from these early signals can be used to refine policies and procedures, leading to more effective crime prevention strategies. Public confidence in these institutions is likely to increase when they observe that crimes are promptly detected and addressed.[24]
For instance, the Cybercrime Helpline, established by the City of Vienna, provides a valuable resource for victims of cybercrime, offering immediate assistance and raising awareness about online fraud.
![]() In Vienna, a helpline has been set up to help victims of cybercrime. In 2021, cybercrime increased by 30 % in Austria. In most cases victims have lost money through online fraud (for example, via phishing emails or fraudulent websites). The City of Vienna therefore set up a Cybercrime Helpline. This is freely accessible for all victims, who can share their story and are being listened to. The City of Vienna also uses the website to raise awareness about cybercrime and tries to increase digital literacy among the local residents by providing free information on how to detect online fraud and how to respond in case of being a victim of cybercrime. The Cybercrime Helpline is a joint project by the Vienna State Parliament and City Council, supported by expert organisations and specialised counselling centres. It took about 1½ years to launch the helpline at a cost of approximately €12 000. Employees of the helpline receive continuous training to be aware of new forms of cybercrime and to deal with conflict management and handling difficult situations. Source: European Public Sector Award |
Ensuring the safety and well-being of victims of domestic violence requires innovative approaches that simplify the process of seeking help and justice. In France, an initiative has been launched to address this need by enabling victims of domestic violence to file complaints directly in medical facilities. This novel approach aims to provide a supportive environment where victims can report incidents of violence without the additional burden of navigating complex legal procedures. By integrating the complaint process within hospitals, the system ensures immediate access to legal support and protection, thereby enhancing the overall response to domestic violence cases.
![]() This French project allows investigating authorities to receive complaints from victims of domestic violence directly within medical facilities. This system strengthens the protection of victims by providing them with a simplified procedure, enabling them to lodge a complaint at the time and place where the violence was initially reported. Plans are in place to expand this system across all of France. As part of a broader effort by the French Ministry of Justice to promote good practices within all its departments, with a particular focus on combating domestic violence, this project aims to facilitate the reporting of violent acts by victims. It also ensures better management of the victims by reducing wait times for investigation services and creating a trustful environment so that victims can easily report acts of violence. This practice became widely adopted in 2020, with many jurisdictions signing protocols or conventions to define deployment modalities for this system. Within the hospital setting, it is crucial to ensure the application of all victim rights under comfortable, dignified, and confidential conditions. This requires a dedicated room equipped with necessary furniture and materials for filing complaints, as well as coordination with other medical professionals and frequent meetings to address cases where a complaint has been filed within the hospital. Regarding the role of the police, investigators, behaving as civilians with unmarked police vehicles, receive complaints from victims directly at medical facilities. For the heaviest cases and most severe violence, the referring doctor will invoke the family protection unit, consisting of six investigators that have received a national specific training. Investigators can also make good use of the victim’s hospitalisation period, during which the victim is momentarily isolated from the aggressor to try to convince her to take action before potentially returning home. In line with this approach, regular engagement with the Medical-Legal team for conducting medical and psychological assessments of the victim is promoted. This project won the 2021 European ‘Crystal Scales of Justice’ prize. Further information: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/2021-crystal-scales-of-justice-prize |
Digital tools allow for a more people-centred justice. eJustice solutions are seen by many Member States as key to enhancing access to justice, allowing people to exercise their rights more efficiently. Digital services offer increased and customisable accessibility, even during crises.[25] COVID-19 has accelerated the digitalisation of court procedures, with lockdowns have necessitated the implementation of online services. Courts worldwide have adopted technology, making online hearings and digital documents the potential new standard.[26]
Another example is the ‘Virtual Digital Interaction Desk’ (EVID) project, an initiative by the Ministry of Justice in Spain, providing secure, inclusive, and environmentally friendly remote services.
![]() The ‘Virtual Digital Interaction Desk’ (El escritorio virtual de interacción digital – EVID) is an initiative by the Ministry of Justice in Spain. Falling within the framework of the 2030 Justice Plan, this project aims at innovating and improving public justice services. Supported by European funds, EVID aligns with the goals of the Next Generation EU programme, promoting a more digital, ecological, and resilient Europe. This project forms part of a broader effort to modernise the justice system and meet the challenges of the digital age. The Virtual Digital Interaction Desk (EVID) allows citizens to take care of procedures by videoconference, create and manage appointments, and also has the advantage of communicating with the Pre-cita service. This automated tool provides legal certainty throughout the citizen care process, as communications will be encrypted, and there are guarantees of integrity. An advancement involves the use of digitalising signature tablets for re-identifying individuals (non-cryptographic signatures) within an organisation or a secure area, during mixed appearances where participants are connected to the meeting room. The EVID project transforms how citizens interact with the justice system. It aims to improve user experience for both citizens and businesses by offering remote services. The project also promotes work-life balance by enabling remote work for professionals and remote care for citizens. Importantly, EVID ensures that digital interactions hold the same weight as face-to-face ones. The project has a strong environmental focus, aiming to reduce unnecessary travel and the associated carbon footprint. EVID also seeks to create a more inclusive justice system by providing equal opportunities for all citizens, regardless of location. Furthermore, the project aims to generate trust in remote interactions, promote innovation in citizen and professional dealings, and provide reusable systems for all administrations. The EVID system allows citizens to manage procedures through video conferencing from any device. The platform offers a secure environment with features such as a predefined agenda, document sharing, session recording, and electronic evidence generation. To ensure a smooth and secure process, EVID integrates with other systems such as the Appointment Application for identification, the Justice Key for secure authentication, and a video conferencing system for secure recordings and information exchange. The project addresses security and privacy concerns by employing digital certificates, non-cryptographic digital signatures, secure communication channels, and encrypted data storage. Blockchain technology is also used to ensure the traceability and immutability of all events and documents within the EVID system. The implementation of EVID has resulted in a safer, more social, inclusive, and environmentally friendly justice system. It offers cost savings through increased efficiency and brings justice closer to all citizens, particularly those in remote areas or facing mobility challenges. The project is constantly evolving, with an update introducing broader authentication options and improved functionalities. These advancements demonstrate the ongoing commitment to providing user-friendly and innovative solutions for the justice system. Source, Ministry of Justice, Spain and European Public Sector Award |
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) criteria for people-centred justice suggest that expecting citizens to understand all laws is unrealistic. The government’s assumption that providing information is sufficient for citizens to act accordingly is often incorrect, especially for those in vulnerable situations. Therefore, digital government services should be designed to be as user-friendly and accessible as possible (e.g. through specific formats, style of text etc) to accommodate specifically needs of citizens belonging to vulnerable groups.[27] An interesting example to help decrease barriers for citizens is the access to judicial services by smartphone. France has developed a mobile app to provide information on judicial proceedings, documents and links to online justice portals for case handling and requests.
![]() The French website justice.fr is the main source of information about judicial proceedings and any information linked to the French justice system. It is the one-stop shop website about the French judiciary for citizens and partners of the judiciary (lawyers, notaries, bailiffs). Next to this website, France has also a more general website, service-public.fr, which has a broader approach dealing with all kinds of situations in a life of a citizen and relationship with public administration. This website also includes justice related questions. In April 2023, the Ministry of Justice launched the mobile application Justice.fr which mirrors the website but adapted to mobile phones. The application aims to improve and simplify information for citizens, businesses and partners of the judiciary to access justice and enforce rights. Origins For citizens having to deal with the judicial system means often stress, as it is normally not frequently occurring in someone’s life. Hence, citizens require an easy access to information that is linked to the actual issue, the situation that they need to deal with. ![]() Providing this information online means that some pedagogical approach is required to guide citizens and respond to their specific needs. This is again different for partners of the judiciary who already have some background knowledge and look for very specific information. Yet also these want an easy-go-to access that corresponds to their specific professional interactions with the judiciary. An important trend regarding digitalisation is that many digital operations should be compatible with mobile phones. The mobile phone is the key tool for most of citizens and professionals to handle day-to-day interactions and to access online supported tools and online search. At the launch of the mobile application the Minister of Justice (Eric Dupond Moretti) declared ‘I want the French to have in their pocket, on their mobile phone, the tools and resources they need to communicate with the legal world. I want justice to be closer, more protective and faster’.[28] The mobile application aims to provide ‘justice at hand’ meaning to accompany citizens in their research for information about their rights, requests and procedures. The app enables the user to
The application mirrors the content of the website – justice.fr - but provides more detailed tips and information, interlinks with other embedded websites. Justice services are being digitalised step by step and have been developed over time in silos. The application can provide one global personnel space where all these services are interlinked. The creation of the application is part of the bigger digitalisation of justice project called ‘Portalis’. The idea is to transform justice in a way so as to dematerialise the judicial proceedings from the start of the proceedings until the decision is served. Results The mobile application was initially developed fairly quickly in about 3 months. It required, however, external support to build it for which a procurement procedure was put in place. In this case it was necessary then to develop a back-end that is compliant with security policies and compatible for management in-house of the Ministry – this took about 6 months. The application is operational for more than 1 year. It has been specifically downloaded by those that have ongoing judicial procedure(s). The number of users mirrors the volume of users of the justice.fr website which is approximately 4 to 5 million users per year. The website justice.fr is somewhat concurring with other websites in place that inform about the French legal system like the website service-public.fr, or masecurite.interieur.gouv.fr, which links to criminal issues and information about criminal law. The latter impacts on the number of users. The app justice.fr mirrors the app masecurite.fr, which was the first application that was created in link to justice. A visual identify applies to all public websites and applications. The design of the application allows to integrate new functionalities over time such as, for example, in May 2024 created options to introduce proceedings at the family court, the guardianship judge, or bringing a civil claim. A back-end office team has been created to deal with updates and content of the application. Because the application is downloadable for apple and android phones the team also needs to deal with the app stores, meaning that users may leave comments or requests. Learning points One of the first learning points was that before one can build an application, it requires the pre-existence of a highly developed website – meaning having rich content in place. Several factors should be taken into account when building an application
Follow-up The French Ministry of Justice has plans to continue to develop services for the app such as chat and call functions, for example. For this purpose, the Ministry made use also of funding available by the European Commission via the Technical Support Instrument from Directorate-General for Structural Reform Support (DG REFORM). This has been of essential support to contribute to continue to develop the mobile application. Source: Ministry of Justice, France For further information: Litigants - Justice.fr: launch of the mobile application to facilitate access to justice |
The new role of chatbots
The Communication ‘Artificial Intelligence for Europe’[29] and the Artificial Intelligence Act[30] delineate three pillars of AI technology: updating technology (first pillar), preparing people (second pillar), and determining the impact of tech rules without undermining rights, law, and democracy (third pillar).
Chatbots can guide people to the adequate place to be heard and providing solutions guaranteeing access to both justice and to information.[31] They simplify interactions with citizens, clarify legal jargon and support contact centres in real time.[32] Chatbots help citizens find information about public services, such as required documents and relevant legislation. Although the Core Public Service Vocabulary (CPSV) exists, it falls short in handling complex cases. Thus chatbots are valuable tools, particularly in the justice sector.[33]
A typical chatbot tool can be provided within a central webpage about the justice system, such as the website of a court administration, to help the user navigate the information. Examples of such chatbot can be found in Latvia and Austria.
![]() In 2019, virtual assistants named Zintis and Justs were introduced on websites linked to the justice system - https://www.ta.gov.lv/lv and https://elieta.lv/web/ - to help customers find the information they need. The assistant is a computer programme establishing a dialogue online between a human and a computer. It is available to customers at any time of the day and night, every day, which enables customers to find information outside the working hours of the authorities, when it is more convenient for them. The assistant helps customers by replying to questions, and also decreases the work of customer service specialists, replacing the technical routine work, enabling employees to focus on work with higher added value, and improving the efficiency of work of the authority. |
![]() The chatbot ‘Justitia’ of the BMJ is an interactive component of the JustizOnline platform (justizonline.gv.at). Justitia provides information on a wide range of digital information and services offered by the Austrian justice system. Content such as queries on the company register and land register, as well as downloads of relevant documents and forms with online submissions to courts and public prosecutors' offices are among the core areas. In addition, Justitia helps with questions about one's own legal procedures, provides an overview of the status, and navigates to file inspection and submissions for ongoing procedures. |
Developments and challenges of online courts hearings
Member States have been progressing at different speeds to enable online court hearings. Partly this was due to a gap of national legal frameworks, as well as requiring important investments to create secure and compliant access to such processes and purchasing and installing the necessary IT tools. At the EU level, a legal basis has been adopted that can also serve for cross-border judicial collaboration and contributes to enhancing national approaches to setting up online legal hearings.
The Council of Europe’s European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) has issued guidelines on videoconferencing in judicial proceedings. These guidelines aim to ensure that videoconferencing does not compromise the right to a fair trial. They include four principles.
- All fair trial guarantees apply to remote hearings.
- States should create a legal framework for remote hearings.
- Courts decide if a hearing should be remote to maintain fairness.
- Courts must protect a party’s right to legal assistance and confidential communication.
Remote participation in a trial can be compatible with human rights standards if all guarantees to a fair trial apply.[34] Security and confidentiality are crucial, given the sensitive nature of some court hearings, and it is also essential that IT experts carefully assess the online platforms used.[35]
In that respect, the ‘Digital Immediacy and Non-Face-to-Face Services’ project in Spain enabled secure, remote interactions between citizens, justice professionals, public administration and the judiciary.
![]() Digital Immediacy and Non-Face-to-Face Services (www.mjusticia.gob.es) is a set of processes and tools that allow remote interactions and trust-building between both citizens and professionals, and public administration. This project, focused on secure identification of citizens and operators, is a joint effort of the Spanish Ministry of Justice, the State Secretariat for Digitalisation and Artificial Intelligence, and the State Tax Administration Agency (AEAT). The following solutions have been established within the Digital Immediacy and Non-Face-to-Face Services.
Sources: ¿Qué es? - Cl@ve, Unifying and Simplifying Identification for Spanish Online Public Services (for information in English) |
In the field of criminal law, online trials can enhance court system management, in particular in terms of reasonable duration of the proceedings.[36] Online hearings can help reduce the number of trials conducted in absentia and strengthen access to justice, for instance for persons that are limited in their physical mobility or those residing abroad.
However, it is crucial to ensure that virtual proceedings do not compromise the fundamental and procedural rights of the parties involved, in particular the right to be present at the trial, as enshrined in Directive (EU) 2016/343. As the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarified, the Directive does not prohibit remote participation in criminal trials where the accused person expressly requests this, and the purpose of the Directive, which is to strengthen the effective exercise of the right to a fair trial and the rights of defence, is not prejudiced.[37]
A European Court of Human Rights judgment against Finland highlighted the failure to ensure fair trial due to inadequate videoconferencing tools, which hindered witness examination and caused delays and an unjustified prolongation of the procedure.[38] Particular caution also needs to be employed as regards the design of safeguards for persons who, due to specific disabilities or other vulnerabilities, experience challenges in the use of online tools. For criminal proceedings, it is therefore essential that the option of participating in person is always retained as a default.
For civil cases, procedural rules allowing the oral part of the procedure to be conducted entirely via distance communication technology are available in all Member States except Cyprus.[39]
4.4 Information exchange systems and case management
| In the words of the Council of Europe’s European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), electronic court filing (eFiling) refers to ‘technological solutions facilitating access to justice by establishing a digital channel that enables the interaction and exchange of data and e-documents between courts and court users’. CEPEJ 2021 guidelines on electronic court filing (e-filing) and digitalisation of courts |
As CEPEJ explains, implementing eFiling is a complex matter. Applying digital solutions to judicial procedures should be understood as a ‘systemic and comprehensive reform’, and ‘building a complete ecosystem of electronic judicial services’. It presents governance challenges, not just technological ones, concerning legal, organisational and socio-cultural considerations in the functioning of judicial bodies. It requires interoperable systems and key digital enablers to be in place, as well as standardisation and simplification of processes, where required and operational adjustments.
- eFiling requires judicial documents to be electronic, authentic and confidential.
- Pleadings and decisions should be in open formats.
- Qualified eSignatures or eSeals should authenticate certain legal acts.
- eDocuments should contain metadata for automated management and provide proof of delivery via an electronic timestamp.
- The system should handle multimedia and large files, and ensure correct handling of e-Evidence with standardised metadata.
- For those unable to use digital channels, paper documents should be accepted and digitalised.
- Scanned documents should have an advanced eSignature for authenticity.
- Internal users need customisable templates and a searchable central repository if used.
As the European Commission’s 2024 Rule of law report identifies through its country chapters, Member States are at different states of developing their eFiling systems and digitalising courts. For instance, Germany is introducing electronic files across all Länder, aiming for a complete transition by 2026. In Greece, full eFiling implementation is delayed and inconsistently available, with usage remaining low due to stakeholders’ unfamiliarity with the tools. A new electronic recording system for criminal proceedings was introduced, applied to 21 courts. Italy’s civil justice is fully digital, with tax justice expected by September 2024; however, some parts of the criminal sector remain behind in digitalisation.
The ‘EVIP’ project in Slovenia, a central communications hub for court logistics, has significantly improved the performance of courts by accelerating judicial proceedings, reducing administrative work, and saving costs, thereby transforming the Slovenian judicial system into a more efficient and digitally advanced entity.
![]() A 2007 project ‘IT support for enforcement procedure based on authentic document’ identified the Slovenian paper-based system in courts as inadequate and set a goal that decisions should leave the court system within 2 working days to significantly speed-up judicial proceedings. The logistical solution was to move to secure electronic transfer (digitalisation and automation) and to centralise the process, ultimately delivering savings worth over 2 % of the courts’ budget. The process This outcome was not achieved overnight, but instead evolved through a sequence of milestones, each one leading from the other. It started with the development of the 'postbook module' with the goal to enable the use of an external printing and enveloping contractor with sufficient capacity. The 'postbook module' was designed to securely transfer all the decisions in electronic form, along with its metadata (name, delivery address, and description of content) to the external contractor. Additionally, a special envelope (a 'machine envelope') was designed to support the new business process, which involved the following steps: printing; enveloping; and printing metadata on the (full) envelope. The system came into effect on 1 January 2008. During 2008, 557 463 deliveries were made using the 'postbook module'. In 2009, this number more than doubled to 1 120 463, which amounts to approximately one in six of all court shipments each year. The fact that the shipments were produced (printed, enveloped) outside of the courts contributed to substantial savings. It was estimated that, in 2009, more than 72 person-years of staff effort were saved, and re-invested in accelerating the entire enforcement procedure. The impressive number of IT-supported deliveries and the outlook of its further growth, led to a new field of research in court logistics: the new business process was named 'postal highway'. In alignment with the IT Strategy, the ‘postbook module’ has been re-used by every new IT system put in place. A project group was established to ensure interoperability of the module. To extend the use of the software to incoming and outgoing mail and to support other types of filing and/or delivery, a specific software, called ‘EVIP’ (the Slovenian acronym for ‘Registry of Incoming and Outgoing Mail’) was created. All the input/output interactions with courts are performed in a controlled and standardised fashion and logistic data can be monitored by the business intelligence system. To minimise the costs and delivery times, an eDelivery module was introduced to EVIP. The system went live in 2011 for insolvency procedures and land registry. In 2011, over 121 000 eDeliveries were made, along with nearly 1.5 million deliveries using the 'postal highway'. In 2014, eDelivery was introduced to the enforcement procedure, lowering the load on the 'postal highway'. In 2015, e-Deliveries and ‘postalhighway’ combined represented more than 50 % of all deliveries. Introduction of eFiling and eDelivery to EVIP During the re-engineering of the land registry and insolvency IT systems, it was decided that electronic filing (eFiling) should be introduced. To further minimise the costs and delivery times, electronic delivery was introduced. A new functionality (module) was introduced to EVIP, called SVEV (Slovenian acronym for 'System for Secure Electronic Delivery'). The system went live on 1 February 2011 for insolvency procedures, with the land registry following on 1 May 2011. During 2011, 121 365 electronic deliveries were made using the SVEV module of EVIP, along with 1 591 498 deliveries using the 'postal highway'. In 2014, eDelivery was introduced into the enforcement procedure, boosting the numbers of electronic deliveries to 790 637, while lowering the load on 'postal highway' to 1 319 470. In 2015, the number of electronic deliveries grew to 1 291 192, along with 2 059 480 deliveries using the 'postal highway', together representing more than 50 % of all deliveries. Related to these reforms Slovenia’s Supreme Court developed another eDelivery solution for the exchange of court documents and cases to make it compliant with the AS4 (Applicability Statement 4) profile of the OASIS ebMS standard. AS4 is an open standard for the secure and payload-agnostic exchange of business-to-business documents using web services. The new system, called ‘Laurentius’, was launched in 2016 and has been used ever since by all the 66 courts in Slovenia to exchange court documents and case information electronically and securely. To do so, it has been using a new software module which replaced the eDelivery software (used since 2011). ![]() Success factors EVIP initiative followed the strategic guidelines from Slovenia's IT Strategy, which identifies four components as the key success factors, each equally important to every IT-related project.
Results EVIP is now a central communications hub between entities across the Slovenian judicial system that participate in court procedures. It acts as a central register of incoming and outgoing deliveries (mail, messages, etc.), as a communication hub between entities, and as an integration layer with court's back-office applications. The EVIP has had a significant impact on the performance of Slovenian courts, especially in the field of logistics (i.e. incoming and outgoing mail). The time needed for preparation and shipment of court documents has been significantly cut (see graph below), even for the court procedures that do not yet fully support electronic delivery. Before the introduction of EVIP, times were calculated in months – now they are calculated in days, or hours in the case of eDelivery, significantly shortening the entire length of court procedures. Moreover, court personnel have been relieved of the administrative work of printing, enveloping and shipping, leaving them with more time to focus on court procedures. EVIP handles around 4.5 million deliveries per year, of which around one-third is still traditionally delivered, with electronic delivery and postal highway amounting to 27 % each. ![]() . ![]() The chart (below) shows the savings in terms of people each year. Due to a strategic decision that core IT systems should be developed in-house, the only attributable costs are salaries of the engineers involved with the project, estimated at €175 000 in total. Set against these direct costs, the cost savings of using the EPIV system, compared with the counter-case of not using it (‘reference costs’), are significant, rising to €4.2 million by 2015 - equivalent to more than 2 % of the courts’ budget. More information about the budget can be found here (in Slovenian). Source: Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Centre for Informatics - Special services - Courts of Justice |
Similarly, the modernisation of the Lithuanian Court Information System (LITEKO) has improved efficiency through advanced court resource management and case distribution models.
![]() Efficient and trustworthy judicial systems are fundamental for any well-functioning democracy. The Lithuanian Court Information System (LITEKO IS) is an integrated information system used by the courts in Lithuania to manage and process judicial cases electronically. By digitalising court procedures and documentation, LITEKO IS’s purpose is to reduce administrative burdens, minimise errors, and expedite case handling. The system aims to provide better access to judicial information for the public and legal professionals, thus fostering transparency and trust in the judiciary. Origins Since its launch in 2004, the Lithuanian court system has relied on LITEKO IS as its core operational platform. The National Court Administration (NCA), an independent institution under the Ministry of Justice of Lithuania, is responsible for the management and administration of LITEKO IS. The LITEKO IS, a game-changer in the Lithuanian court system, not only facilitates critical functions for judges and court administrators but also revolutionises public access to justice. It automates court-related data collection, processing and systematisation, and is a comprehensive repository for case materials. It enables seamless data exchange with public services and registries and supports delivering electronic court services to the public. Importantly, LITEKO IS covers all courts and processes within the Lithuanian General Court System, from district and appellate courts to specialised courts like the Supreme Administrative Court and Regional Administrative Courts (excluding the Constitutional Court, as it is not part of the Lithuanian General Court System). This comprehensive coverage ensures that all court documents are registered and stored in LITEKO IS, thereby ensuring a transparent and accessible justice system. LITEKO IS maintains a comprehensive record of all court proceedings, even when paper forms are used. Each case is assigned a unique identifier, and the system tracks the case through all stages of the process. All procedural documents related to civil and administrative cases are fully digitalised; however, complete digitalisation has not been reached in criminal cases due to legal regulations requiring paper forms in specific instances (particularly cases involving confidentiality, security, and/or non-disclosure concerns). For example, civil and administrative case protocols can be recorded in audio format, but criminal cases still require paper protocols because audio recordings are not considered a suitable substitute.[40] Despite undergoing phased modernisation, LITEKO IS had become technologically outdated. The system's slow performance became the key impetus for a comprehensive modernisation initiative, which was carried out in two stages, described in detail below.
Results Both stages of the LITEKO IS modernisation project yielded a series of tangible outcomes with a significant impact on Lithuanian courts.
In addition, the modernisation of the LITEKO IS (and the storage of relevant data) indirectly contributed to optimising Lithuania's judicial system. By analysing caseload and judges’ workload data, the LITEKO has formed the base for significant judicial reform, which was implemented in 2018 and 2024.[47] The 2018 reform streamlined the court structure based on the territorial principle.[48] The number of district courts was consolidated from 49 to 12 strategically located courts across the country: Alytus, Kaunas, Klaipėda, Marijampolė, Panevėžys, Plungė, Šiauliai, Tauragė, Telšiai, Utena, and the Vilnius Region (with 4-5 subdivisions). Additionally, a separate District Court of Vilnius City was established. Building on this success, a further optimisation is planned for July 2024: the Plungė District Court will undergo a divisional reorganisation, with its rights and obligations divided between the Klaipėda District Court and the Telšiai District Court. This move will further optimise the workload across the court system in Lithuania.[49] NCA is committed to maintaining and updating the LITEKO2 IS for 5 years after its completion. The state budget allocated to administration and courts will determine further continuity of results. The remaining 3rd stage of the project is necessary to modernise LITEKO fully. The following tasks still need to be implemented
The LITEKO2 IS is scheduled to be launched in the second half of 2024; this delay was necessary to accommodate the adoption of legal and regulatory changes related to optimising and reorganising Lithuania's court system, which will enter into force on July 1, 2024. Learning points Other Member States' public administrations can learn valuable lessons from Lithuania's experience with LITEKO IS. Lithuania achieved significant efficiency gains and enhanced transparency by modernising the entire judicial system through LITEKO IS. Leveraging external funding, such as the Norwegian Financial Mechanism, proved instrumental in financing large-scale modernisation initiatives. However, the modernisation process also faced several challenges. The technological obsolescence of the original LITEKO has underscored the importance of ongoing maintenance and updates to prevent systems from becoming outdated. Operational challenges, including uneven workload distribution, inefficient data processing, and budgetary constraints amid unforeseen circumstances (like the COVID-19 pandemic), led to delays in project execution and highlighted the importance of realistic project planning and resource allocation. Close collaboration within a team is essential when implementing such large-scale projects. This includes a cohesive team with interchangeable roles, and continuity is maintained through effective project management. Additionally, it is important to establish reliable methods for storing and sharing information, ensuring that it remains accessible to all team members, including new additions to the team. Furthermore, before the beginning of the project, a detailed study is needed so that the team can fully understand the project’s scope and intended outcomes, providing a clear vision for everyone involved. Nevertheless, before embarking on such a project, it is important to confirm that the market has sufficient reliable and capable suppliers supporting the chosen technology. This ensures a smoother project execution and reduces the risk of disruptions. Lastly, adequate human and financial resources are needed to allow for the interchangeability of team members and faster achievement of goals. In conclusion, the LITEKO2 project represents a leap forward for Lithuania's court system, as it enables essential functions for judges and court administrators and transforms public access to justice, improving how people interact with the legal system. Nevertheless, LITEKO's true strength lies in its long-term adaptability. Its new system's design (based on the OpenText document platform), which consists of layers of infrastructure, repository, service, development, and user applications, ensures its ability to evolve alongside the legal framework and court needs. This means that changes in the legal framework can be accommodated by updating specific system components rather than overhauling the whole platform. Thus, these features guarantee that LITEKO remains responsive to changes well into the future. Follow-up Looking ahead, LITEKO2 paves the way for the upcoming modernisation project of the Lithuanian Courts' E-Service Portal. This project will prioritise addressing the legal needs of external users and individuals. While the exact timeline remains to be determined, groundwork is underway to gather input from external users and court communities. Source: Information Technology Division, Technology and Resource Management Department of National Courts Administration and Legal Services Policy Group, Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania. |
The eServices project at the Patras District Civil Court in Greece has also significantly enhanced public service delivery by digitalising court processes, enabling citizens and legal professionals to access case information, submit applications, and receive digitally-signed certificates online.
![]() The Patras District Civil Court in Greece developed an online information system to digitalise public services. Hosted by the Greek Government’s Cloud Services, the system was developed in-house using open-source technologies. The system offers a wide variety of services to citizens, lawyers, public notaries and third-party public administration agencies. It is also used by the judges and employees of the Patras District Civil Court to manage internal processes. Deployment of the system included the Public Administration Users’ Authentication Service (OAuth2.0, TAXISnet codes), an important functionality that enables the users to digitally sign certificates and documents. Services offered to the citizens Citizens can obtain information on the procedures of the Patras District Civil Court, download templates of documents and applications, make enquiries on judgment publication for their cases. Certification using TAXISnet codes enables submitting online applications for certificates and then receiving digitally signed certificates, booking appointments for disclaiming heritage, requesting copies of published last wills. Services offered to the lawyers ‘In addition to services offered to the citizens, lawyers have the possibility to retrieve detailed information about their cases at the Patras District Civil Court and track case files. Also, they can generate reports including all their cases and programme automatic notifications (sent via email) on published judgment or newly scheduled initial hearings. Those functionalities require previous registration. However, the lawyers may submit applications for the issuance of certificates on behalf of their clients, using the account they already have at the Patras District Civil Court, without logging in with TAXISnet codes.’ ‘By the time of the application for the European Public Sector Award, the system had more than 5 900 active citizen user accounts and more than 600 active lawyer accounts that were served. With the help of the platform, more than 16 000 cases were registered, and more than 22 500 certificates were retrieved.’ Sources: https://www.eirinodikeio-patras.gov.gr/, European Public Sector Award |
The Justiz 3.0 Initiative in Austria implemented a fully digital file management system, enabling simultaneous processing of files, reducing waiting lists, and allowing citizens to remotely check the status of their files.
![]() The strategic Justiz 3.0 initiative in Austria was set up in 2014 to improve IT support for various user groups of the justice administration. It takes thereby a holistic approach and focuses on all operations of the justice system. In practice, this means the creation of a file management system that is completely digital and cases are fully electronically handled. A first pilot was launched in 2016 focusing on the digital file management in a few courts. During this pilot users were involved from an early stage to be able to get their feedback included early in the process. After the running of some successful pilots, Justiz 3.0 has been expanded to more areas, such as decision-making support and register-keeping. When Justiz 3.0 started, a Judicial Digital Workplace (JDAW) was set up to support integrated working across the various justice system applications. As a consequence, judiciary staff could automatically work in all applications with a file number. More specifically, this means that once a file number has been created, it no longer needs to be entered again when additional applications are opened for that file reference number. In 2019, Justiz 3.0 was rolled out at all regional and district courts (this was a piloting of digital file management in general civil proceedings). More pilots followed and from 2023 criminal court proceedings were also fully digitalised. From the end of 2023, all new cases in civil and judicial proceedings have been handled digitally by all Austrian courts and all public prosecutors’ offices. Around 160 courts and prosecution services are now benefiting from the digitalisation of file management in civil, criminal and justice administration matters. In addition, approximately, 700 hearing rooms have been adapted for hearings with digital files. It is expected that by the end of 2025 the whole Austrian justice administration will have become digital. The judiciary digitalisation has had both advantages for staff working in courts and for the public. For staff, the filing systems have become less time-consuming and waiting lists have been reduced. With the file number it is possible for several people to simultaneously process files. This also helps citizens, who are able to remotely check the status of files and personal presence is no longer needed in all cases. Via JustizOnline (a digital information and service platform), files can be viewed from a PC or smartphone to check the status of proceedings. Although Justiz 3.0 is a relatively new project, 2023 figures show that more than 4,000 users are digitally accessing their files, and 1.1 million cases are managed digitally. Austria has, partly thanks to Justiz 3.0, one of the most technically advanced judiciaries in Europe, which is underlined through the regular top rankings in European benchmarking. Sources include Justice 3.0 - BMJ |
The Data-Driven Justice project in Spain allows to transition from a ‘document-driven’ to a ‘data-driven’ approach, creating an open-access, inter-administrative data platform that integrates various data sources, enables evidence-informed policy decisions, and ensures responsible data management.
![]() Spain's Data-Driven Justice project supports the European Data Strategy by emphasising data-driven decision-making within the justice system. Led by the Ministry of Justice and managed by the State Technical Committee for Electronic Judicial Administration, this initiative involves regional administrations and judicial bodies. It has two main goals
The project's architecture includes
Adhering to a data manifesto ratified by all involved parties, the project ensures responsible data management, treating data as a public good and upholding cybersecurity and personal data protection standards. The ultimate aim is a more efficient, transparent, and citizen-centric justice system. Source: European Public Sector Award |
The LVwG Styria project in Austria transforms the Regional Administrative Court of Styria by offering a digital public service platform that provides easy, secure and 24/7 access to appeal procedures, streamlines court processes, thus reducing environmental footprint, and enhancing legal certainty.
![]() LVwG Styria is a digital public service platform of the independent Regional Administrative Court of Styria, providing digital access to appeal procedures. The project aims to enhance trust in the judiciary, eliminate existing barriers, and ensure easy access to justice for the public. Each citizen can interact with the judiciary in a simple, digital way and submit personal judicial matters quickly and unbureaucratically. The services offered include selected online court procedures, available 24 hours a day and without local restrictions, from any desktop or smartphone. The project extends the independent court services to include cutting-edge, charge-free, and transparent digital services. The highest security and accessibility standards are guaranteed. The project LVwG Styria originated following a need to replace an outdated application from 1992 that was used to support the resolution of appeal procedures. The project had several objectives in mind
A broad range of citizens were involved on site at the court to test the developed prototypes. Within the implementation project, several internal user-friendly reviews were conducted on a use-case oriented workshop basis with judges and secretaries. A homogenous and modern appearance of the judiciary is ensured by integrating previously isolated services. This is an essential factor in the public perception of the judiciary as a modern, easily accessible, citizen-oriented, and professional public institution. With the creation of this platform, the Styrian judiciary provides state-of-the-art and citizen-friendly access to the judicial services and become more transparent and comprehensible to citizens and businesses. In this way, it is increasing confidence in the judiciary as the third pillar of the rule of law and contributing to build a better Europe, enhancing legal certainty and peace. LVwG Styria is in continuous expansion with the planification of several further services; therefore, the team is working to enhance the platform and implement new features to address various target groups. At the core of the project, the task of the judiciary – the creation of legal certainty and peace – remains unchanged, and it is considered essential how these services arrive at the citizen. This is exactly where this new service comes into play and creates considerable benefits for all citizens and companies in Austria, through the fundamental redesign of the accompanying value-added processes. LVwG Styria also facilitates an optimisation of processes at court; the digital shift will enhance efficiency in the administration and will lead to reduced waiting and travel time as well as costs. Emissions are reduced due to cutting the need to travel and eliminating the need for printing thousands of pages due to digital file handling and electronic inspection. This project is therefore also making a contribution to protect the environment, which underlines the sustainability of this project from operational, financial, and environmental points of view. For further information: https://www.lvwg-stmk.gv.at/ (in German), European Public Sector Award |
The project ‘Court Administration of Latvia’ provides a digital public service platform that ensures easy, secure and round-the-clock access to court proceedings. eFiling platforms allow specifically to make case related information immediately accessible to all lawyers involve, parties of the case as well as the general public.
![]() The Court Administration of Latvia is a digital public service platform of the independent Latvian courts and Land Registry Offices, providing digital access to judicial proceedings (civil, criminal and administrative). The eCase portal allows unregistered users to follow progress of a case having access to basic information and data, such as the location of the case, adopted decisions, outcome of proceedings, whether the court’s decision entered into force, as well as the name of judge that examined the case. The parties of the case can access the specific files more in detail by registering to the platform and authentication processes such as eID card and eSignature. If the person does not have the means to do the authentication process online, it can do otherwise by presenting physically at the court in charge of the case.[51] The usage is granted for 24 months. The eFile also includes audio and video files in cases where parties followed the proceedings from distance. The eCase is also available for criminal cases for investigation stage and during court proceedings. The Court Administration of Latvia also facilitates an optimisation of processes at court; the digital shift will enhance efficiency in the administration and will lead to reduced waiting and travel time as well as costs. Emissions are reduced due to cutting the need to travel and eliminating the need for printing thousands of pages due to digital file handling and electronic inspection. This project is therefore also making a contribution to protect the environment, which underlines the sustainability of this project from operational, financial, and environmental points of view. In the future, solutions for alternative dispute resolution will also be integrated into the eCase system. |
The GeFa project, a nationwide application for Justice Services in Germany, enhances the efficiency and user experience of the judicial system by standardising data recording, processing, and management across all Bundesländer, integrating artificial intelligence for case management tasks.
![]() In Germany, the judicial system is largely decentralised with each Bundesländer having significant responsibilities over their own judicial administration. This has resulted in great differences between the administrations of each judicial system, with states having their own filing management system. Having 16 different types of software has proven to be costly and inefficient, and led to fragmented and unaligned justice systems, with substantial differences in the level of digitalisation between justice administrations across Länder. The project Gemeinsames Fachverfahren (GeFa), launched by the federal government in 2023 and applying to all Bundesländer, aims at modernising and aligning the judicial system in the country. The GeFa project is setting up a uniform and nationwide programme, which applies to all ordinary courts, prosecutor’s offices and specialised courts. GeFa is a user-friendly and modern application that standardises data recording, processing and management across all Bundesländer. It thereby integrates 20 external applications which operate across three distinct infrastructure environments. GeFa uses a combination of different agile methodologies (SAFe framework and Scrum), which is a novelty in the German justice system. Agile in an umbrella term for different software development processes. The Agile Manifesto supports teams and business who want to innovate and adapt quickly, while also mitigating risks. The benefits of making use of this combination of agile methodologies are that there is a continuous development cycle, allowing for rapid feedback from technical, legal experts and end users. User experiences get priority, for example through a professional user interface design, user group testing and accessibility compliance in line with EU regulations. GeFa also uses artificial intelligence (AI) for the automation of case management tasks and to support user experience. The GeFa project has a Programme Steering Committee with representatives of various states: Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Hesse, Lower Saxony and North Rhine-Westphalia, under the Bavarian Presidency. There is a separate State Advisory Council with representatives of all 16 Bundesländer. Through this Council, the states can express their views and are kept informed on developments. GeFa influences the work of around 100 000 end users, including legal professions and administrative staff. All 16 Bundesländer are using the same software to administer their justice, while at the same they still keep control as the various tasks and requirements can be implemented in different ways depending on the federal regulations in each state. Although it is expected that GeFa will increase the efficiency of the justice administration and improve the user experience, it is too early to know the results of the project. In February 2024 GeFa was first tested in Karlsruhe, Düsseldorf and Darmstadt by judiciary employees, followed by testing in Berlin, Koblenz, Bad Vilbel, Hamburg and Rostock in May 2024. Sources European Public Sector Award and GeFa - The Joint Specialist Procedure |
4.5 AI tools to support judges and court staff
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI), notably exemplified by the proliferation of generative AIs such as ChatGPT, has sparked discussions about its impact on the justice field. Scholars are exploring how AI could transform law practice and its conceptual frameworks. AI offers benefits in terms of speed and volume management within legal systems.[52] Potential applications of AI include legal research, support for administration of justice, chatbots, and predictive justice.
At the same time, the use of AI tools must respect and uphold individuals’ fundamental rights and must not perpetuate or exacerbate discrimination.[53] It should also be in full compliance with European legislation, including on AI and data protection. The application of AI in judicial proceedings raises concerns about accountability, transparency, and the influence of algorithms on judicial decision-making.[54] Frameworks to manage AI risks, particularly for high-risk applications, were developed.[55] EU rules, adopted in July 2024 under the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA), aim to ensure that AI systems are safe, transparent, and respect fundamental rights, thereby fostering trust and innovation in AI technologies within the EU. The AIA becomes fully applicable in 2026.
AI tools for law enforcement should be safe, robust, and respect principles of fairness and transparency, including the principle of inequality of arms in the context criminal proceedings. Any prejudice to the effective exercise of the right to a fair trial and the rights of defence must be precluded. The use of such tools should therefore undergo risk assessment and necessity testing, with safeguards matching identified risks.[56]
There is a debate about the role of machines in making autonomous decisions, with some authors emphasising the need for human involvement. In judicial proceedings, it is in fact a fundamental right (enshrined in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) to be judged by an independent and impartial tribunal, i.e. a human, not a machine. Instances of AI assessments being biased have been identified.[57] Tools assessing recidivism risk have been used in the US to determine sentence length or parole, raising questions about the potential for automating criminal procedures. However, these tools are highly problematic, as they have important limitations, including the inability to predict human behaviour scientifically, reliance on group characteristics rather than individual information, and inability to differentiate between offence severities.[58] Indeed, such tools are also likely to perpetuate deep rooted discrimination.
Judges started to engage in exchanges and discussions on the impact of AI on the rule of law and potential ethical challenges. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) published a useful global toolkit on AI and the rule of law for the judiciary. The toolkit includes useful questions and reflections that judiciaries should examine before starting to introduce AI tools into the justice system. The UNESCO also published recommendations on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence detailing more specifically how an ethical impact assessment should be conducted and how to continue to monitor and evaluate the AI tool. The UNESCO also started in 2024 consultations to develop Guidelines for the Use of AI Systems in Courts and Tribunals.
Another useful tool on the development of ethical AI tools in justice is the Council of Europe’s European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. In addition, the CEPEJ Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board provides expert advice on AI in the judicial environment and can be consulted. Examples of AI tools in justice systems around the globe can also be found and reviewed in the CEPEJ’s Resource Centre on Cyberjustice and AI.
In Germany, the AI tool for cases of travel delay streamlines decision-making in air passenger rights disputes by providing judges with data-driven insights, thereby expediting settlement cases and enhancing the efficiency of judicial processes.
![]() An AI application to support judges in formulation of decisions in a similar manner (similar to other cases) in the area of flight passenger rights – was developed in response to automated tools by legal representation companies (lawyers). The latter are able to submit a high number of court claims to due to automated tools. This helps to speed up decision-making in court cases and to support judges with an additional tool. A pilot project called Frankfurt Electronic Judgment Configurator Frankfurt (’Frauke’ – Frankfurter Urteils-Konfigurator Elektronisch) has been run at the local court in the field of air passenger rights. The pilot project used data from boarding passes, flight times, weather data and data resulting from previous decisions in similar cases. AI is hereby used as an additional piece of support for judges when deciding in an air travel dispute. More specifically, this means that the individual data is automatically read out for the decision. The judge selects a case type with a click, and the software compiles the finished decision from preconfigured text modules. Of course, the judge still examine, fine-tune, review and approve the decision. All text modules remain fully editable and contribute to further learning of the tool. The tool contributes to accelerate administrative processes specifically in mass claims – concerning the same flight for example. It is not the intention that AI would replace actual decision-making by judges, but to support a quicker processing of decisions. The regions of Brandenburg and Hesse will take over the use of AI in settlement cases regarding travel delays with flights. The Ministry of Justice of Brandenburg has allocated €200 000 for the use of AI applications in 2023 and 2024. Hesse will try out an AI tool which can analyse pleadings, read out metadata and use text modules to support judges when preparing their judgment. For further information: Hessen Justiz - Hesse and Brandenburg cooperate on the AI project ‘FraUKe’ (in German), Digitalisation of civil proceedings in Germany | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbright |
The Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in Justice project by the Spanish Ministry of Justice automates repetitive tasks, reducing backlogs, and enabling 24/7 utilisation.
![]() The Spanish Ministry of Justice has faced a significant challenge of an increasing backlog of files and requests. Accumulating over time, the backlog limited the Ministry’s capacity to meet its obligations effectively. Combined with increased migration in Spain, the situation led to delays in critical procedures, including the granting of nationality by residence. As part of its digital transformation journey, the Ministry decided to address this pressing issue and recognised that manual processes were no longer sustainable and sought to automate repetitive tasks. Their goal was twofold: reduce the backlog and enhance overall efficiency. Inspired by the digital agenda and supported by European funds, the Ministry streamlined its operations and robotic process automation (RPA) has been implemented in different tasks and processes.
To design, implement and drive process automation across all areas of the Judiciary and its related functions effectively, the Ministry of Justice established an Automation Excellence Centre (Centro de Excelencia de Automatización - CEA). This new organisational model elevated governance and project architecture, enabling acceleration of existing processes and reducing the workload on Judiciary personnel. On the administration side, the RPA processes are managed centrally by the Directorate-General for (Dirección General para la Transformación Digital de la Administración de Justicia - DGTDAJ), which is in constant dialogue with various departments of the Ministry discussing which processes can be further automated. Key benefits of RPA implementation include
RPA in Justice was the second prize winner of the European Public Sector Award (EPSA) 2023-24 in the Digital Transformation category. Moreover, the project received several other awards
Sources: https://www.administraciondejusticia.gob.es/-/robotizacion-de-procesos-judiciales, The Ministry of Justice receives an award for its robotic process automation projects (mjusticia.gob.es), Presentación de PowerPoint (aslan.es), Automatización CDCJ-Minerva (justicia.es), European Public Sector Award |
DataJust, aimed to streamline the process of bodily injury compensation in France by providing a reference framework for judges. However, this project had to be stopped due to biased training data and complexity of decisions linked to the award of damages in cases of accidents.
![]() In France, DataJust, an automated data processing system, was authorised by a decree on 27 March 2020 to develop an algorithm for evaluating public policies, creating a benchmark for bodily injury compensation, and aiding dispute resolution. The algorithm records the amounts requested, offered, and allocated to victims for each type of damage. This initiative aimed to establish a compensation benchmark for various bodily injuries adjudicated by judges. Bodily injury litigation was chosen due to its repetitive nature and the need for quantified responses based on numerous criteria. The algorithm’s development required access to personal data from hundreds of thousands of decisions on personal injury cases. DataJust initially relied on decisions from judicial and administrative courts of appeal between 2017 and 2019. The software aimed to provide a database for compensation amounts and an indicative reference framework for judges. The Ministry of Justice also intended to use the ‘Dintilhac nomenclature’ as a reference for personal injuries. The goal was to develop an algorithm providing a reference framework for each damage item to determine average compensation based on recurring criteria. In January 2022, the Ministry of Justice abandoned the DataJust project due to concerns from stakeholders, particularly magistrates, who feared the tool would standardise legal action and reduce their independence. Despite its potential to aid decision-making, the project faced technical challenges. The algorithm’s development relied on a large volume of judicial decisions for training, but extracting relevant information from these text-based decisions proved difficult. The specific form and syntax of court decisions made it hard to distinguish the final awarded amount from other mentioned amounts. To overcome this, standardising court decision drafting or developing natural language analysis methods specifically for French legal language could be considered. However, these options could constrain judges in providing case-specific responses.[59] The DataJust project was also intended to respond to another tool available to lawyers – legaltech product Case Law Analytics which uses AI to estimate specific risks linked to a case and to advise about a strategy to defend the client. Case Law Analytics uses data from court of appeal decisions[60] to advise about tendencies of compensation for permanent functional impairment for example, demonstrating important differences about compensation awarded by courts in different court districts. This shows that public administration projects work alongside legal tech solutions. Sources: Données personnelles - DataJust | Justice.fr, Case Law Analytics - Simulez les décisions de Justice |
The CREA project (Conflict Resolution with Equitative Algorithms), through its innovative use of algorithms for dispute resolution, offers a cost-effective, fair, and expedited solution for EU citizens, streamlining national and cross-border proceedings.
![]() The use of algorithms for dispute resolution could provide a fair, expedited and cost-efficient option for EU citizens, but there was a lack of implementation of such a model. The Conflict Resolution with Equitative Algorithms (CREA) project[61] uses algorithms to assist in resolving civil disputes, potentially streamlining national and cross-border proceedings in the EU. The project’s goal is to eliminate differences caused by various national laws across EU countries. It focuses on applying algorithms to resolve disputes involving the allocation of goods or issues, such as inheritance disputes or the division of marital assets in a divorce. The project also aims to develop new algorithms to distinguish available rights from national mandatory rules. Another initiative is to establish a ‘European Common Ground of Available Rights (ECGARs)’ using algorithms for better settlements. The final stage involves developing software that might in the future ensure integration into the European e-Justice portal. The CREA approach allows judges and lawyers to assist disputants in reaching a fair, balanced, and satisfactory solution. This approach benefits EU citizens by providing a cost-effective way to access justice. Research examined the use of Conflict Resolution with Equitative Algorithms (CREA) in resolving civil disputes, particularly asset distribution in divorce and inheritance cases. The findings showed that CREA software can effectively assist in dispute resolution at both national and cross-border levels. The establishment of ECGARs, a significant achievement of this study, helps address disparities in laws among EU Member States regarding cross-border asset division. Although the study was based on a small sample of EU legal systems, the results suggest that the CREA project was effective in its testing phase. However, further research is needed to examine the results and user feedback on the CREA model’s applicability and efficiency, and to explore the legal systems of all EU Member States.[62] Source: CREA PROJECT (crea-project.eu) |
4.6 Tools to support organisation of evidence
‘Electronic evidence’ (e-Evidence) is data stored by a service provider used as evidence in criminal proceedings. ‘Metadata’ describes other data, including identity, origin, history, and timestamps. A ‘trust service’ manages electronic signatures, seals, timestamps, delivery services, certificates, and website authentication, and preserves related certificates.[63]
Securing electronic evidence is crucial for modern crime investigations and prosecutions, both domestic and cross-border. It is vital to have effective, rights-compliant mechanisms for this, ensuring necessity, proportionality and respecting the rights to fair trial, privacy, data protection, and confidentiality of communications.[64]
From 2018 to 2022, requests to service providers like Google, LinkedIn, Meta, Reddit, Snapchat, and TikTok surged by 159 %. In 2022, Germany made nearly half of all EU requests (48%), with France at 1 %. Google received the most requests, followed by Meta.[65]
In general, electronic evidence should be securely collected and submitted to courts using reliable services, considering the higher risk of potential loss or destruction compared to non-electronic evidence. Member States should establish secure procedures for this purpose.
In civil and administrative proceedings, courts need to be aware of the challenges in seizing and collecting electronic evidence abroad, especially in cross-border cases, and should cooperate in such instances. The receiving court should inform the requesting court about the conditions and restrictions under which evidence can be taken. The collection, structuring, and management of electronic evidence should facilitate its transmission to other courts, particularly appellate courts. The transmission of electronic evidence electronically should be encouraged to enhance court proceedings’ efficiency, and the systems and devices used for this purpose should ensure the evidence’s integrity.[66]
For instance, the Hansken open digital forensic platform, developed by the Netherlands Forensic Institute, provides a scalable solution for analysing large volumes of digital data.
![]() Digital data and traces play an increasingly important role as proof in criminal cases. The volume, variety and variation of this data is growing rapidly. In order to interpret this data for optimal use in forensic research, there is a need for a system that helps categorise, analyse and give relevance to data. To cope with this need, The Netherlands Forensic Institute developed an open digital forensic platform with the aim to support investigative services, the Public Prosecution Service and criminal law justice. The launch of the digital forensic platform, better known under the name of ‘Hansken’, was stimulated after a child pornography case in 2010, during which the police did not have sufficient means to investigate relevant data. How does it work? All users of the platform, have their own Hansken installed within their own organisation. Per case, the investigative team imports all extracted data from the seized items, such as mobile phones, computers and USB’s, into Hansken. Using the Hansken Query Language, the platform makes all digital traces in a case easily accessible. It also facilitates collaboration between case investigators, data scientists and digital experts in the investigations. A very important aspect of Hansken is that the traces are especially made accessible to the tactical investigators, which gives them a greater part in the digital investigation. An important transformation in digital forensics. Big data Hansken is specifically suitable for investigations that contain large amounts (up to hundreds of Terabytes) of digital data. And the Hansken platform is scalable (using frameworks as Hadoop and Elastic), which means that partners can process large amounts of data using a distributed network. Artificial Intelligence To reach the most effective way of investigating the data, there is also an increasing integration of different AI models into the platform, such as speech-to-text, text recognition, translation, semantic search and object detection. Working together in a community The platform is more than just a tool. It is also a community in which users share forensic knowledge and work together on the development of the platform. And the Hansken Community is growing. In 2024, the platform is used by governmental organisations in 15 countries. Partners (law enforcement and academia) set up their own Hansken infrastructure on premise and are fully responsible for their implementation of Hansken. More importantly, they are allowed to extend their implementation with additional functionality and share those developments with the community. This way, digital forensic knowledge is strengthened and enlarged by (inter)national cooperation. Parties can connect existing tools and libraries (formats) to the platform and develop their own extensions and plugins using Hansken API’s (application programming interfaces). Viewing facility for lawyers Next to the criminal investigators involved in an investigation, public prosecutors, judges and lawyers have access to the same sources and see the same context of the digital data. This helps to make the trial as fair as possible (principle of the ‘equality of arms’). Lawyers can also view the data from their office. For further information: European Public Sector Award |
Footnotes
- [1] Interview conducted with Aitor Cubo Contreras, General Director of Digital Transformation in the Ministry of Justice, 22.05.24. ⬆
- [2] https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2023-25758. ⬆
- [3] BOE Resolutions of 12.12.2021 and 14.06.2022. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2021-20786 and https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2022-10105. ⬆
- [4] https://www.economistjurist.es/noticias-juridicas/el-ministerio-de-justicia-permitira-declarar-por-videoconferencia/. ⬆
- [5] Interview with Aitor Cubo Contreras, 22.05.2024. ⬆
- [6] Interview with Aitor Cubo Contreras, 22.05.2024. ⬆
- [7] Interview with Aitor Cubo Contreras, 22.05.2024. ⬆
- [8] https://www.mjusticia.gob.es/es/ElMinisterio/GabineteComunicacion/Paginas/El-Expediente-Judicial-Electr%C3%B3nico-alcanza-los-200-000-accesos.aspx. ⬆
- [9] https://www.mjusticia.gob.es/es/institucional/gabinete-comunicacion/noticias-ministerio/carpeta. ⬆
- [10] Interview conducted with Aitor Cubo Contreras, 22.05.24. ⬆
- [11] Interview conducted with Aitor Cubo Contreras, 22.05.24. ⬆
- [12] https://www.mjusticia.gob.es/es/institucional/gabinete-comunicacion/noticias-ministerio/premio-robotizacion. ⬆
- [13] Digitalisation of justice in the European Union: A toolbox of opportunities (COM(2020) 710 final). ⬆
- [14] Council of Europe (2022), European judicial systems: CEPEJ Evaluation Report - 2022 Evaluation cycle (2020 data). ⬆
- [15] Idem, fig. 4.3.2. ⬆
- [16] Dubois, C., Mansvelt, V., and Delvenne, P. (2019), Entre nécessité et opportunités : la digitalisation de la justice belge par l’ordre des avocats. Droit et société, (103), 555-572. Éditions Lextenso. ⬆
- [17] Koulu, R. (2019), Law, Technology and Dispute Resolution: Privatisation of Coercion. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1-138-55538-9. ⬆
- [18] Kramer, X., Hoevenaars, J., Kas, B., and Themeli, E. (eds.) (2022), Frontiers in Civil Justice: Privatisation, Monetisation and Digitisation, Erasmus University Rotterdam and T.M.C. Asser Instituut. ISBN: 978 1 80220 381 3. ⬆
- [19] Council of Europe Committee of Ministers (1995), ‘Recommendation No. R (95) 11 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning the Selection, Processing, Presentation and Archiving of Court Decisions in Legal Information Retrieval Systems’. adopted on 11 September 1995 at the 543rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies. ⬆
- [20] Consultative Council of European Judges (2004), Opinion No. 6 (2004) of the Consultative Council of European Judges to the Attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Fair Trial Within a Reasonable Time and Judge’s Role in Trials Taking into Account Alternative Means of Dispute Settlement, adopted at its 5th meeting (Strasbourg, 22-24 November 2004). ⬆
- [21] Figure 49, EU Justice Scoreboard 2024. ⬆
- [22] Council of the European Union (2011), Council conclusions inviting the introduction of the European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) and a minimum set of uniform metadata for case law (2011/C 127/01), Official Journal of the European Union, C 127/1. ⬆
- [23] OECD (2021), OECD Framework and Good Practice Principles for People-Centred Justice, OECD Publishing, Paris ⬆
- [24] Gottschalk, P. and Asting, C. (2020), Crime Signal Detection Theory: Two Case Studies of the Five-Stage Model from Observer to Whistleblower. Deviant Behavior. pp. 461-471. ⬆
- [25] European Commission. (2023), Effective legal protection and access to justice: 2023 Annual report on the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (COM(2023) 786 final). ⬆
- [26] Biard, A., Hoevenaars, J., Kramer, X. and Themeli, E. (2021), ‘Introduction: The Future of Access to Justice - Beyond Science Fiction’ in: Kramer, X., Biard, A., Hoevenaars, J. and Themeli, E. (eds.) New Pathways to Civil Justice in Europe. Springer, Cham. ⬆
- [27] Scheltema, M. and Timmer, I. (2022), ‘Digitisation of Government Services from the Citizen’s Perspective: Putting Humans First’ in K. Jacob et al. (eds.), Liquid Legal – Humanization and the Law (pp. 175-192). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. ⬆
- [28] French Ministry of Justice Press Communication, 27 April 2023, Le ministère de la Justice lance son application mobile | Ministère de la justice. ⬆
- [29] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Artificial Intelligence for Europe (COM/2018/237 final). ⬆
- [30] Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) ⬆
[31] Paul Nemitz presentation in Flash Report: 5th webinar on Artificial Intelligence in the Justice Field: Chatbots and Tools Facilitating Access to Information, 13 December 2022.
https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/0020be93-fe83-4a1f-8650-2f4da70dd84a_en?filename=Flash%20Report%205th%20webinar%20AI%20in%20the%20justice%20field.docx ⬆
- [32] eu-LISA Industry Roundtable. (2022). Digitalisation of Justice: Turning Challenges into Opportunities (Event Report). Madrid, Spain. ⬆
- [33] Presentation from Efthimios Tambouris, Flash Report: 5th webinar on Artificial Intelligence in the Justice Field: Chatbots and Tools Facilitating Access to Information, 13 December 2022. https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/0020be93-fe83-4a1f-8650-2f4da70dd84a_en?filename=Flash%20Report%205th%20webinar%20AI%20in%20the%20justice%20field.docx ⬆
- [34] Advocate General Medina (2024), Opinion on Case C-760/22 (ECLI:EU:C:2024:328). ⬆
- [35] Mensi, M. (Rapporteur) (2022), Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the digitalisation of judicial cooperation and access to justice in cross-border civil, commercial and criminal matters, and amending certain acts in the field of judicial cooperation (COM(2021) 759 final — 2021/0394 (COD)) and Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 2003/8/EC, Council Framework Decisions 2002/465/JHA, 2002/584/JHA, 2003/577/JHA, 2005/214/JHA, 2006/783/JHA, 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA, 2009/829/JHA and 2009/948/JHA, and Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards digitalisation of judicial cooperation (COM(2021) 760 final — 2021/0395 (COD)) (2022/C 323/13). ⬆
- [36] Falcone, A. (2022), ‘Online Hearings and the Right to Effective Defence in Digitalised Trials’ in Bachmaier Winter, L. and Ruggeri, S. (eds.) Investigating and Preventing Crime in the Digital Era. Legal Studies in International, European and Comparative Criminal Law, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13952-9_9 ⬆
- [37] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 July 2024, FP and Others (Procès par visioconférence), C-760/22, EU:C:2024:574. ⬆
- [38] Taavitsainen v. Finland. 2009, Application 25597/07. ⬆
- [39] EU Justice Scoreboard 2024. ⬆
- [40] Interview with the NCA. ⬆
- [41] For example, the Institute of Judicial Officers, Lithuania’s Prison Service, and the Lithuanian Post. ⬆
- [42] Judges experienced significant disparities in the volume of assigned cases. ⬆
- [43] A lack of transparent allocation processes led to inefficiencies, such as uneven workloads, mismatching expertise with case requirements, which results in longer decision times and lower quality judgements, and mismanaging resources trying to correct imbalances. ⬆
- [44] Lengthy processing times hampered data accessibility and court activity reporting. ⬆
- [45] Norway Grants (2016), ‘Modernisation of the courts’ information system (systems for case-handling and audio recording)’, https://www.teismai.lt/data/public/uploads/2016/02/20150819_puslapiui_it_eur-1.pdf. ⬆
- [46] Interview with the NCA. ⬆
- [47] Interview with the NCA. ⬆
- [48] The territorial principle aimed to centralise court management and make it more efficient by aligning the territorial jurisdictions of courts with the territorial layout of central police and prosecutor's offices (thus eliminating organisational obstacles to case processing). Even though the 49 district courts previously in operation were consolidated into 12 district courts, the number of courthouses in the country remains unchanged: court services continue to be available in the same locations and premises, but court administration is conducted from several main centres. ⬆
[49] Order No. XIV-2135 of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania of 29th of June 2023 ’On the reorganisation of the district court’,
https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/22034e321a4d11ee9f8efaacc26fd687?jfwid=13plljr01p. ⬆
- [50] LITEKO leverages the European Commission-funded project ‘Effective e-access to court decisions, launched in November 2022, which will integrate ECLI with LITEKO2 and create interfaces with the e-Justice portal. ⬆
- [51] European Commission 2024 Rule of law report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Latvia (SWD(2024) 814 final). Brussels, Belgium. ⬆
- [52] Morison, J., and McInerney, T. (2024), ‘When should a computer decide? Judicial decision-making in the age of automation, algorithms and generative artificial intelligence’ in Turenne, S. and Moussa, M. (eds.), Research Handbook on Judging and the Judiciary, Edward Elgar-Routledge. ⬆
- [53] European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2018), The CEPEJ European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial systems and their environment, Presentation note. ⬆
- [54] Barbaro, C. (2018), The European Ethical Charter on the use of AI in judicial systems and their environment, CEPEJ Secretariat, PowerPoint presentation. ⬆
- [55] European Commission (2020), Digitalisation of justice in the European Union: A toolbox of opportunities (COM(2020) 710 final). ⬆
- [56] European Parliament (2021), Artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters (P9_TA(2021)0405), European Parliament Resolution of 6 October 2021 on artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters (2020/2016(INI)). (2022/C 132/02). ⬆
- [57] Završnik, A. (2021), ‘Algorithmic justice: Algorithms and big data in criminal justice settings’, European Journal of criminology, 18(5), 623-642. ⬆
- [58] European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers, Study on the use of innovative technologies in the justice field – Final report, Publications Office, 2020. ⬆
- [59] Pécaut-Rivolier, L. and Robin, S. (2023), Justice et Intelligence Artificielle: réconcilier l’irréconciliable? Justice and Artificial Intelligence: reconcile the irreconcilable? Statistique et société (11)2, Société Française de Statistique (SFdS). ⬆
- [60] Lahana, M. (2022), DataJust ou l’algorithmisation du dommage corporel : retour sur la décision du Conseil d’Etat, online article, Village de la Justice, 29.03.2022. ⬆
- [61] Project financed via the Justice Programme 2014-2020, JUST-JACC-EJU-AG-2016 Action grants. ⬆
- [62] Salehi, S. S. and Giacalone, M. (2019), ‘Conflict Resolution with Equitative Algorithms - A tool to establish a European Common Ground of Available Rights’ in Romeo, F., Martiucceli, S. and Giacalone, M. (eds.), The European Common Ground of Available Rights (pp. 110-146, Scientifica Napoli. ⬆
- [63] Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and Council on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings. ⬆
- [64] Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and Council on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings. ⬆
[65] SIRIUS EU Electronic Evidence Situation Report 2023,
https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/SIRIUS EUEESR 2023.pdf p. 6. ⬆
- [66] Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (2019), Guidelines on electronic evidence in civil and administrative proceedings (CM(2018)169-add1final). Council of Europe. ⬆






